President, Treasurer, Secretary, or publisher

Grant Workspace

Checking your existing Board Access session…

Protected Board operations

Find, decide, and prepare

Review current federal opportunities, ignore poor fits, or start an editable application foundation. The system never determines eligibility or submits an application.

BoardReturn to Board home

Seven-day reminder

Weekly opportunity review

Loading the last completed review…

Human decision required: a Grants.gov listing is only a lead. Read the complete official notice, verify MCHS eligibility, obtain Board approval, and use the funder's submission system.

Official federal source

New Grants.gov candidates

Checking museum, historic-preservation, archives, and humanities opportunities…

This automated search covers selected federal opportunities from Grants.gov. It does not cover every state, local, private-foundation, or invitation-only program.

Society records

Grant pipeline

Drafts and decisions are private Board records. Select Edit draft to continue writing or review the working application.

Ignored and archived opportunities (0)

Editable writing foundation

Grant draft

Replace prompts with evidence-supported language from the official notice and approved Society records. Blank or bracketed text is unfinished.

Official-listing guide

What this opportunity asks for

Add an opportunity or start from an official candidate to load its guidance.

Before applying: this is a starter based on the structured Grants.gov listing, not the complete Notice of Funding Opportunity. Open and verify the full notice, forms, page limits, registrations, attachments, and submission instructions.

Evidence-grounded grant assistant

Build the preliminary review packet

Retrieve the current authorized grant record and official Grants.gov listing details.
Analyze the supporting evidence registered below against the recorded guidelines.
Summarize the documentation without inventing missing facts.
Recommend next steps and prepare a named human-review workflow.
Draft a preliminary application aligned to the requirements recorded from the complete notice.

Customize creates an opportunity-specific starting point from the official listing. Then record the complete-notice requirements and supporting evidence. The assistant identifies gaps; it does not decide eligibility or approve submission.

Opportunity and decision

Opportunity title Funder Program Opportunity number Status Open date Deadline Award amount, if confirmed Required match, if confirmed Official opportunity URL Board owner Official notice verified date Proposed MCHS projectThe customizer prioritizes this project focus, then aligns it with the official listing. Eligibility determination and evidence Next action Source record

Guidelines and supporting evidence

Requirements from the complete official noticeStructured Grants.gov details are not the complete notice. A human reviewer must read and cite the controlling document. Scoring criteria and reviewer prioritiesUse the funder's wording and weighting. Do not infer unstated scoring preferences. Supporting evidence registerThe assistant analyzes only what is entered in this protected record; it does not claim to have opened unlisted files.

Application narrative

Project thesisOne disciplined statement connecting verified need, proposed work, public benefit, and sustainable capacity. Organization background Primary audiences and access barriers Need statement Project description Goals and measurable outcomes Work plan and responsible owners Budget narrative and match sources Evaluation plan Sustainability after the grant Attachments and approvals needed Questions for the funder or Board Internal notes

Application architecture and controls

Logic model Deliverables, milestones, and acceptance evidence Requirement and scoring matrix Measurement and attribution plan Budget assumptions and source worksheet Risk register and mitigations Decision gates

Board collaboration

Review requested from Board discussion and handoff notesThis protected field is shared with authorized grant reviewers. Preserve prior entries and append new dated notes.

Generated review packet

Preliminary: these outputs are regenerated from the current protected record. Reviewers must correct them against the cited evidence and complete official guidelines.

Evidence analysis Documentation summary Recommended next steps Prepared human-review workflow Preliminary guideline-aligned grant draft